Which phrase best captures the purpose of building an argument map in analytic design?

Which phrase best captures the purpose of building an argument map in analytic design?

• A. To illustrate how data supports the conclusion and where gaps exist
• B. To collect raw data
• C. To perform quantitative analysis only
• D. To replace the need for sensemaking

Answer: (A)

Mapping the argument makes the reasoning chain explicit: it shows how data, observations, and assumptions connect to conclusions, and where evidence is strong, where it’s weak, and where gaps or alternative explanations exist. This clarity lets analysts trace the justification, challenge weak links, and revise the argument before decisions are made. It also supports sensemaking by providing a shared, visual representation of how conclusions are reached, rather than merely gathering raw data or focusing only on numbers. In short, the map captures how data supports a claim and highlights what’s missing or uncertain, which is essential for rigorous analytic design.

Mapping the argument makes the reasoning chain explicit: it shows how data, observations, and assumptions connect to conclusions, and where evidence is strong, where it’s weak, and where gaps or alternative explanations exist. This clarity lets analysts trace the justification, challenge weak links, and revise the argument before decisions are made. It also supports sensemaking by providing a shared, visual representation of how conclusions are reached, rather than merely gathering raw data or focusing only on numbers. In short, the map captures how data supports a claim and highlights what’s missing or uncertain, which is essential for rigorous analytic design.